Tenant Issues in Real Estate Leases Part II

Part I of this post focused on basic provisions found in commercial real estate leases such as assignment and subletting, use restrictions and the determination of the commencement date. Here in Part II, below, we will address other important issues from the tenant’s perspective including insurance, mutual waivers and defaults.

 

 

Tenant’s Insurance and Self-Insurance.

 

·        Liability Insurance. Landlords typically carry their own liability insurance policies, so tenants should not be too concerned over the amount of tenant’s coverage limits. Instead, the tenant should check with their risk management department (or outside insurance agent) to determine the current and appropriate coverage amount.  Tthe landlord and property manager will likely be required as additional insureds. The primary benefit to these parties is the insurer’s obligation to defend claims, which is not limited by the amount of the policy.

 

·        Property Insurance. Most landlord form leases require tenants to fully insure the tenant’s furniture, equipment and other personal property. Unless there is a special reason that landlord wants this equipment insured, these clauses can often be revised in the negotiations to allow tenant to carry such insurance at its option or self-insure.

 

Release and Waiver of Subrogation.   This is a legal issue that is often overlooked, but is very important from a risk management perspective.

 

·        Release. In a good mutual clause, the landlord and tenant “release” each other from liability for damage to their respective property and agree that they will look solely to their insurance, regardless of negligence or fault. The rationale from the landlord’s perspective is that a leak in the roof that destroys valuable computer equipment owned by tenant is something that is more easily insured by the tenant, since the tenant better knows the value and the potential risk of loss. That said, a tenant should be able to obtain reciprocal provisions from the landlord for the benefit of the tenant, even in small leases. Typically, tenants are paying for the landlord’s insurance either as an element of rent in a gross lease or as a direct pass-through; accordingly, it is equitable for the tenants to receive the benefit of this insurance. Note, however, that most form leases only protect the landlord in this regard. A one-sided waiver of claims provision requires the tenant to look to its own insurance coverage, even if the casualty is the result of the landlord’s negligence. 

 

·        Waiver of Subrogation. Insurance policies provide that the insurer is “subrogated” to any claim its insured may have against third parties for damages to the property insured under the applicable policy. In the absence of a “waiver of subrogation”, if the tenant’s negligence caused fire damage in the landlord’s building, the landlord’s insurer could “step into the shoes” of the landlord and pursue a claim against the tenant for the damages through its right of subrogation. If the lease contains release language, the applicable party must obtain waiver of subrogation provisions in its policy; otherwise, the party risks validating their insurance coverage.

 

·        Insurance Company Responses. Insurance companies often resist waiving subrogation even though they rarely use the right. Push hard and you will generally prevail.

 

Indemnity and Hold Harmless.   The parties should agree to protect each other based on who can most easily and efficiently obtain the insurance protection.

 

·        Indemnity. The term “indemnity” relates to one party “indemnifying” or protecting the other against claims of third parties.

 

·        Hold Harmless. The term “hold harmless” is another term for “release”, pursuant to which one party agrees to release or hold harmless the other party with respect to claims between the parties. The term “hold harmless” is often mistakenly used when the parties intend to refer to indemnification.

 

·        Objective. Similar to the discussion regarding release and waiver of subrogation above, the objective of indemnification provisions should be to allocate claims amongst the parties so that they are covered by appropriate insurance.

 

Default.

·        Notice of Monetary Defaults. It is crucial that a tenant receive adequate notice of monetary defaults. Remedies for default are often severe, and it is not unreasonable to require the landlord to give the tenant an opportunity to cure before pursuing eviction. On the other hand, landlords typically will not want to have to give a default notice every month in order to collect the rent. A common compromise for smaller tenants is to limit the number of notices in any given 12 month period and perhaps the total number of notices during the lease term.

 

·        Vacating. Most landlord form leases provide that deserting, vacating or abandoning the premises is an event of default, especially so in retail leases. Covenants to operate in retail leases cannot be specifically enforced in Virginia and are rarely found in anchor tenant leases or other leases involving sophisticated parties. A reasonable compromise that protects the interest of both parties is to provide the landlord with a right of termination in the event tenant vacates the premises or “goes dark” (in a retail context). From the tenant’s standpoint, you will want to negotiate a requirement that the premises be vacant for a minimum period and exclude vacancies due to fire, remodeling and similar circumstances. Also, if the tenant has made a substantial investment in improvements, the tenant may want to negotiate for reimbursement of its unamortized costs.

Tenant Issues in Real Estate Leases

An earlier blog post focused on important issues relating to the Letter of Intent. Assuming now that you have gotten past the letter of intent stage and are moving forward to a binding lease agreement, we will now focus on common legal issues reviewed from the tenant’s perspective. If your current lease is up for renewal or you are in the market for new space, the following is a list of important but basic issues to address with your attorney in connection with any successful lease negotiation with your landlord. 

This Part I will focus on basic provisions such as assignment/subletting, use restrictions and the commencement date, and Part II will address other issues including insurance, mutual waivers and defaults.

 

Rent Commencement Date. 

The rent commencement date is the date set forth in the lease when rent first becomes due. Often this is tied to when the build-out of tenant improvements is complete or when the tenant first occupies the space to conduct their business.

 

·        Tenant Issues. The tenant should provide some protection with an outside delivery date. There may be issues affecting delivery of the premises including the removal of existing tenants and the completion and performance of landlord’s work. Often a tenant can provide for an estimated delivery date after which free rent or some other financial remedy will accrue to the tenant and an outside delivery date after which the tenant will have the right to terminate the lease if the space has not yet been delivered. Both retail and office tenants will want to have sufficient time to build out and fixture their space.

 

·        Landlord Issues. From the landlord’s perspective, know that the landlord will want the rent to commence on a date that is within the landlord’s control. Tenants typically will not want to pay rent until they are open for business. An outside rent commencement date could be tied to execution of the lease, landlord’s delivery of the premises with its work complete or some other objective factor.

 

 

 

Assignment and Subletting Issues. 

As a tenant, you need flexibility to transfer your leasehold interests in the event of unforeseen changes in the economy, your business or simply the amount of space you need. Therefore, rights to assign or sublease the lease with as few restrictions from landlords as possible are very important.

·        Assignment vs. Subletting. An assignment is a transfer by a tenant of its entire interest in the lease. A sublease is a transfer of less than the tenant’s full interest (such as less than the entire premises or for less than the remaining term). Absent specific restrictions, the laws of most States provide that leases can be assigned and subleases entered into without landlord’s consent.

 

·        Consent Not to be Unreasonably Withheld. This has become the standard in negotiated commercial leases. Landlords, however, often include a list of criteria that it is reasonable for them to consider. These criteria could include:

 

-           Financial strength of assignee (independent of continuing liability of original tenant).

 

-           Business reputation and experience.

 

-           For retail leases, experience in operating for the proposed use and the use is compatible with tenant mix and not in violation of any covenants, restrictions or agreements.

 

-           Tenant not then in default beyond any applicable notice and cure periods.

 

·        Sale of Business. Tenants should include provisions permitting a transfer of the lease in connection with a sale of the business or in connection with a corporate reorganization. And for a retail use, a sale all stores in a given retail market should trigger a permitted assignment.

 

·        Use Issue. For retail uses, providing that consent is not to be unreasonably withheld on assignments and sublettings is not worth much unless the tenant also negotiates for flexibility in changing its permitted use.

 

·        Release of Liability. It is very desirable, but often difficult, for the tenant to obtain language in the lease providing that it is released from all liability from and after the date of the assignment. A landlord will strongly resist such an approach, but may agree depending on the net worth of the assignee or other similar factors.

 

Use Restrictions.

This typically applies to retail uses and not office uses. A retail tenant often wants assurances from the landlord that no other tenant in the shopping center will compete with their current use. 

 

·        Primary Purpose Restrictions.   Landlords often attempt to negotiate exclusives prohibiting retail operations whose primary purpose is the tenant’s category of use (i.e., prohibit stores whose primary purpose is the sale of consumer electronics, as opposed to an outright prohibition on the sale of consumer electronics).

 

·        Existing Tenant Rights.  A landlord will often provide that exclusive use restrictions are subject to the rights of tenants under existing leases. Most small shop leases will be limited to a specific use and no other purpose. Anchor and other major tenant leases, however, may permit a change in use, and a landlord therefore may not be able to guarantee that it can prohibit an existing tenant from changing its use or assigning to a third party in violation of a new exclusive. The issue to negotiate becomes the tenant’s potential remedies if a landlord breaches the exclusive.

New Financial Reforms to Change Real Estate Market?

It has been widely reported that Northrop Grumman has chosen a building located in the Fairview Park area of Fairfax County to relocate approximately 300 employees from Los Angeles. Certainly this decision bodes well for the Northern Virginia region as a whole, as proximity to Washington, D.C., the Pentagon and the Northern Virginia technology centers offers many advantages. In recent years, other corporate giants such as Hilton, CSC, and Volkswagen of America have all relocated to Northern Virginia. After deciding on Virginia instead of Maryland, Northrop Grumman focused on sites in Arlington and Fairfax Counties before ultimately selecting the Fairview Park property. State and local government incentive programs were considerable.

One very interesting aspect of this transaction is that Northrop Grumman elected to purchase the building instead of entering into a lease as was widely expected. There are two main business issues at play. First, clearly they are taking advantage of current conditions in the commercial real estate sector to buy the property at a significantly lower price than what the property sold for less then three years ago. Published reports in The Wall Street Journal and elsewhere indicate that Northrop will purchase the building from ING Office Fund for approximately $78,000,000.  Note that the building was purchased in 2007 from Verizon Communications Inc. for $105,000,000. Second, under proposed financial reforms and accounting changes scheduled to take effect in 2013, companies are to report leases as a long-term liability instead of an annual operating expense. It has been widely reported that the accounting change was a factor in Northrop’s decision. 

The effect to the commercial real estate market if more companies elect to purchase instead of lease could be seismic. Lease terms could become shorter than what is now typical, and more purchase and sale transactions could be the norm. Expect this issue to be the focus of many in the months to come.